Legal Opinion
Lawton v. Weiner
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 4, 2005No. AC 25114PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The defendants Marc S. Weiner and TMG Marketing, Inc. (TMG), 1 appeal from the judgment rendered against them after a hearing in damages. On appeal, they raise claims attacking the court’s subject matter jurisdiction, the propriety of the default and the damages awarded. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
An acrimonious business relationship between the plaintiff, Michael Lawton, and the defendants began the parties’ journey to this court. A tortuous and contentious procedural history exacerbated the conflict and made its resolution needlessly arduous for all…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hi-Ho Tower, Inc. v. Com-Tronics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Palomba v. GraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Label Systems Corp. v. Samad AghamohammadiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Automotive Twins, Inc. v. KleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Peters v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. v. Jakks Pacific, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Weiner v. ClintonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Bagley v. Yale UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- McClendon v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Rosenfield v. I. David Marder & Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.