Legal Opinion
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. v. Jakks Pacific, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 2006No. 04-CV-8223 (KMK)PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KARAS, District Judge.
Plaintiff World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. (“WWE”) filed this action against Defendants Jakks Pacific, Inc. (“Jakks”), Jakks Pacific H.K. Ltd. (“Jakks H.K.”), Road Champs, Ltd. (“Road Champs”), THQ, Inc. (“THQ”), THQ/Jakks Pacific LLC (“THQ/Jakks”), Stanley Shenker & Associates, Inc. (“SSAI”), Bell Licensing, LLC (“Bell Licensing”), Stanley Shenker (“Shenker”), James Bell (“Bell”), Jack Friedman (“Friedman”), Stephen Berman (“Berman”), Joel Bennett (“Bennett”), and Brian Farrell (“Farrell”). Plaintiffs original Complaint asserted federal claims…
2Cases cited107 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. v. Jakks Pacific, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Sea Tow Services International, Inc. v. PontinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Volpe v. Nassau CountyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Ruotolo v. Fannie MaeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.