Legal Opinion
Rosenfield v. I. David Marder & Associates, LLC
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 7, 2008No. AC 28208PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
In this breach of contract action, the plaintiff, Edward Rosenfield, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, I. David Marder & Associates, LLC, and Marder & Kallet. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that the action was commenced beyond the applicable statute of limitations, General Statutes § 52-581. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of the plaintiffs appeal.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Doty v. MucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Rosato v. MascardoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Mayer v. Biafore, Florek & O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Flannery v. Singer Asset Finance Co., LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Piteo v. GottierConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Lee v. Harlow, Adams and Friedman, PCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Vaccaro v. Shell Beach Condominium, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Mollica v. TooheyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.