Legal Opinion
Hi-Ho Tower, Inc. v. Com-Tronics, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 12, 2000No. SC 16227PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The plaintiff, Hi-Ho Tower, Inc., appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendants, Com-Tronics, Inc. (Com-Tronics),'and its principal officer, John Becker, on the complaint, and for Com-Tronics on the third *22count of its counterclaim. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly: (1) instructed the jury as to the elements of a claim for tortious interference with business expectancies, and denied the plaintiffs motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on Com-Tronics’ counterclaim for tortious interference;…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Alaimo v. RoyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Konover Development Corp. v. ZellerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Johnson v. Priceline.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Macomber v. Travelers Property & Casualty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Pestey v. CushmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Craig Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Viacom Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.