Legal Opinion

McClendon v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 17, 2006No. AC 25563PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Charlie McClendon, appeals, following the granting of his petition for certification, from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The following procedural facts are relevant to our disposition of the petitioner’s appeal. The petitioner was convicted, following a jury trial, of two counts of felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54c, attempt to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-134, and two counts of robbery…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. State v. McClendonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. James L. v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Lawton v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mejia v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. Carter v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Kearney v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Carter v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. Smith v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API