McClendon v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The petitioner, Charlie McClendon, appeals, following the granting of his petition for certification, from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The following procedural facts are relevant to our disposition of the petitioner’s appeal. The petitioner was convicted, following a jury trial, of two counts of felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54c, attempt to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-134, and two counts of robbery…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. McClendonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- James L. v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Lawton v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by17 opinions
- Mejia v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Carter v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Kearney v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Carter v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Smith v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.