Legal Opinion
Palomba v. Gray
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 21, 1988No. 13047PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The defendant in this paternity action, Richard E. Gray, appeals from the decision of the trial *22court setting aside the jury’s verdict and ordering a new trial. We find no error.
The record discloses the following. The plaintiff, Laurie Palomba, and the defendant met in the summer of 1975 when the plaintiff was thirteen years old and the defendant was fifteen years old. They both lived on Rawley Avenue in Waterbury. Shortly after they met, they began to have sexual relations. According to the plaintiff, their relationship continued until October 13, 1975. She testified that she had last had…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Birgel v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Seals v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Gaines v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- A-G Foods, Inc. v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Audubon Parking Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Barclay & Stubbs, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. HammondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Wichers v. HatchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.