Noble v. Whitten
Washington Supreme Court
Motions to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered October 20, 1903.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley., J.
Two appeals have been taken in this cause and respondents have moved to dismiss them both. One ground of the motion to dismiss the last appeal is that a former one was pending when the last one was taken. At the oral argument of the motion, appellants’ counsel stated that they have abandoned the first appeal, and rely upon the last one only The motion to dismiss was not served until after the second notice of appeal was served. Under similar circumstances this court has held that the first appeal is abandoned, and that it shall not prevent the prosecution of the later one when duly taken.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- DeRoberts v. StilesWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- O'Connor v. LighthizerWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Jenkins v. Jenkins UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- City of Spokane Falls v. BrowneWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Griffith v. MaxwellWashington Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carstens & Earles, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Tatum v. GeistWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Lalakea v. Laupahoehoe Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1939
- Shippen v. ShippenWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Kalb-Glibert Lumber Co. v. CramWashington Supreme Court · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.