Legal Opinion

DeRoberts v. Stiles

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1901No. 3388PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from. Superior Court, Lincoln County. — Hon. Charles H. Heal, Judge.

1Per curiam

This cause is here on appeal from the superior court of Lincoln county. Kespondents move to dismiss the appeal upon several grounds:

First. That'the notice of appeal has not been served in the manner required by law. It is urged that the only service of the notice, as shown by the record, was by mail. We think service by mail is sufficient, under the authority of §§ 4890, 4891, 6504, Bal. Code, when the person making the service and the person upon whom service is to be made reside in different places between which there is regular communication by mail, as was the case here.

Second. That…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phyfe v. RileyNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  2. Flanders v. AumackOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Singly v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Warren v. FishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
  5. Goodyear v. GoodyearSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In Re RigdenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  2. Burgoon v. LavezzoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  3. Fidelity Mutual Savings Bank v. MarkWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Call v. JeremiahOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Bloomingdale v. WeilWashington Supreme Court · 1902

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API