Tatum v. Geist
Washington Supreme Court
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the superior court for Clallam county, Hatch, J., entered January 9, 1905, vacating a default judgment against garnishees, and quashing the service of the writ of garnishment.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.
On the 28th day of September, 1904, a writ of garnishment issued out of the court below in a certain action therein pending, wherein Tatum & Bowen were plaintiffs and W. A. Geist and others were defendants, against the Niagara Fire Insurance Company of the city of New York, the London Assurance Corporation, and others. On the same day, the writ was served on the Niagara and London companies, the service being made on a resident, .agent of said companies, authorized to solicit insurance in their behalf. On the 21st day of October, 1904, a default judgment was entered against said companies, in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Thompson v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Deming Investment Co. v. ElyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Nelson v. DennyWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Griffith v. MaxwellWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Gaffney v. MegrathWashington Supreme Court · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Carstens & Earles, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Chehalis Coal Co. v. LaisureWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Pierce County v. BunchWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- In Re Halle's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Watkins v. Peterson Enterprises, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.