Legal Opinion

Lalakea v. Laupahoehoe Sugar Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1939No. Nos. 2326 AND 2327PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PETERS, J.

This is a suit for partition. The legal title of particular shares or interests claimed in the property subject to suit Avas in controversy. The issues involving title Avere first heard and determined by the circuit judge in chambers, jury Avaived. From an interlocutory decree entered and filed on January 16, 1935, determining such issues an appeal Avas taken to this court. (See Lalakea v. Laupahoehoe S. Co., 33 Haw. 745.) Upon remand the circuit judge ordered partition in kind of parts of the property and the sale of the remainder. Sale Avas made; the sale…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Maxwell Land Grant & Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Kingsbury v. BucknerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. White v. JoyceSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Walker v. HallettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
  5. Rankin v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sharp v. Hui Wahine, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Pancakes of Hawaii, Inc. v. Pomare Properties Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Leslie v. Estate of TavaresHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Chapman v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1961
  5. In Re the Estate of CampbellHawaii Supreme Court · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API