O'Connor v. Lighthizer
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tlie superior court for Lincoln county, Richardson, J., entered September 11, 1903, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, dismissing’ an action for the specific performance of a contract to convey real estate.
1Opinion of the Court
Hadley, J. —
The appellant (plaintiff below) filed a bond in the superior court to secure costs. Eespondents now move to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the sureties upon the cost bond were not served with notice of' the appeal, and have not joined therein. In support of the motion we are referred to Cline v. Mitchell, 1 Wash. 24, 23 Pac. 1013; Carstens v. Gustin, 18 Wash. 90, 50 Pac. 933; *155State ex rel. Billings v. Port Townsend, 27 Wash. 728, 67 Pac. 1135; Pierce v. Commercial Inv. Co., 30 Wash. 272,. 70 Pac. 496, and Brockway v. Abbott (post), 74 Pac. 1069.
We have arranged the cases…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cline v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Reiner v. CrawfordWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Carstens v. GustinWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. Billings v. City of Port TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Brockway v. AbbottWashington Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Wooddy v. Benton Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Stewart v. LarkinWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Walker v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Sipes v. Puget Sound Electric Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
- Grant v. HuschkeWashington Supreme Court · 1913
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.