Legal Opinion

Carstens & Earles, Inc. v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1915No. 12202PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered June 20, 1914, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to foreclose a mortgage, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff commenced this action in the superior court for King county, to foreclose a mortgage on land in the city of Seattle, executed by the defendants to John G. Smith and wife. The city of Seattle was made a defendant because it claimed a local assessment lien upon the land. J. B. Coughlin was made a defendant because he claimed to be the owner of another local assessment lien by purchase of a delinquent certificate therefor from the city of Seattle. The trial resulted in a decree of foreclosure, decreeing the lien of the plaintiff’s mortgage to be superior to the *90assessment lien…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Provident Institution for Savings v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Bibbins v. W. W. Clark & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  4. Ryan v. North Alaska Salmon Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Wabash Eastern Railway Co. v. Commissioners of East Lake Fork Special Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Dearing v. State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Hollenbeck v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Nalle v. EavesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Morrissey v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Guinn v. McReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API