Legal Opinion

Kalb-Glibert Lumber Co. v. Cram

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1910No. 8215PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county, Rice, J., entered February 18, 1909, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to foreclose a lien on a vessel.

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

Rudkin, C. J.

This was an action to foreclose a lien on a vessel for the purchase price of material used in its construction. The complaint alleged that the owners were about to remove the vessel beyond the jurisdiction of the court, and a receiver was appointed to take charge of the property pendente lite. After the appointment of the receiver, the defendants in the action petitioned the court to release the vessel, upon their substituting a bond in the penal sum of $1,500 in its place and stead. The prayer of this petition was granted and the defendants filed a bond with the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. O'Connor v. LighthizerWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Davis v. VirgesWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Noble v. WhittenWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Campbell v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1858

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Salo v. Pacific Coast Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. State ex rel. Bogle v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Copper Leaf, Llc, V. Ace Paving Co. Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2024
  4. State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State ex rel. Eureka Cedar Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API