Legal Opinion

Rice Lands & Products Co. v. Blevins

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1923No. Civ. No. 2588PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

May 17, 1915, defendants gave C. F. Adams a written option to purchase 2,988 acres of land, the greater part of which was in rice, together with water rights, pumping, and equipment, and rights of way. It appears that defendants owned a half section of the land and held the remainder under lease with agreement to purchase. They had in turn leased parts of the lands to tenant rice-growers. The option provided:

“We will convey to you clear title to all the above land, and transfer all rights, privileges, leases, etc., relating to the entire project for the net sum of $80.00 per acre, to be paid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zeimer v. AntisellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Hicks v. PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Ropes v. John Rosenfeld's SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Wright & Kimbrough v. DeweesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Yrisarri v. WallisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Ford v. Palisades Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Love v. GulyasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Santa Clara Properties Co. v. R. L. C., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Hoffman v. PartridgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API