Pickens v. American Mortgage Exchange
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN (H. C.), J.
This is an appeal from the judgment of dismissal following the granting of defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs filed a “Complaint For Money, Damages for Fraud and to Foreclose Mechanics Lien” followed by an “Amendment to Complaint” in which it was alleged that the plaintiff was a general contractor duly licensed by the State of California. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment was based upon affidavits which established that plaintiffs were not licensed general contractors, as required by Business and Professions Code section 7031. Plaintiffs contend…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Saporta v. BarbagelataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Grant v. WeatherholtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Comet Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Payne v. De VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Hydrotech Systems, Ltd. v. Oasis WaterparkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Trees v. KerseyIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Vitek, Inc. v. Alvarado Ice Palace, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Sumner Development Corporation v. ShiversAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.