Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. M. U.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 10, 2009No. 2008807661; Petition Number 105321; A139717PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Mother appeals from a judgment “establishing dependency jurisdiction and disposition” with respect to her daughter. In response to this court’s order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed on the ground that the notice of appeal was not timely filed, mother has moved for leave to pursue an otherwise untimely appeal. Specifically, she urges the court to extend the rationale of State ex rel SOSCF v. Hammons, 169 Or App 589, 10 P3d 310 (2000), to dependency “jurisdiction/disposition” cases, such as this one, where mother’s court-appointed trial counsel failed to file a timely…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Holcomb v. SunderlandOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Miller v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. T. L.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Department of Human Services v. W. S. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Dept. of Human Services v. C. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. Dept. of Human Services v. C. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API