Legal Opinion
Department of Human Services v. W. S. C.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 29, 2012No. 09J5718; Petition Number 05J5718; A149189; 09J5719; Petition Number 05J5719; A149190; 09J5720; Petition Number 05J5720; A149191; 09J5721; Petition Number 05J5721; A149192; 09J5722; Petition Number 03J5722; A149193PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
The juvenile court terminated father’s and mother’s parental rights with respect to five of their children: N, C, G, L, and W. Mother timely appealed the termination judgments, and we affirmed those judgments on this date. Dept. of Human Services v. T. M. M., 248 Or App 352, 273 P3d 322 (2012). Father, however, did not timely appeal because his trial counsel mishandled the filing of his notices of appeal. He asks that we nonetheless allow his late appeal and reverse the termination judgments. For the reasons that follow, we are not authorized to create a judicial remedy for father’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Department of Human Services v. T. M. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Dept. of Human Services v. T. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
- Dept. of Human Services v. T. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2026