Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. Sunderland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1995No. SC S42212PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUnis, J.

On April 18,1995, plaintiff petitioned this court for a writ of habeas corpus, asserting that he is entitled to be released from the Lane County jail, where he is serving 90 days pursuant to a judgment of the circuit court on a plea of guilty to the crime of assault in the fourth degree. That judgment placed him on probation to the court for five years and ordered, as a condition of that probation, that plaintiff serve 90 days in the Lane County jail. Judgment was entered on or about March 6,1995, and plaintiffs anticipated release date is May 26, 1995.

Relying on ORS 137.320(4) and related…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Zockert v. FanningOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. DeFazio v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. CarmickleOregon Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Farmers Ins. Co. of Oregon v. MowryOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Batzer Construction, Inc. v. John BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Kilminster v. Day Management Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. CBI Services, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. OfodrinwaOregon Supreme Court · 2013

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API