Legal Opinion

Department of Human Services v. T. L.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 4, 2015No. 110440J; Petition Number 110440J02; A155300; 110441J; Petition Number 110441J02; A155301; 110442J; Petition Number 110442J02; A155302PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

In this consolidated appeal, father appeals judgments changing the permanency plans for his three children.1 Following a permanency hearing in which father’s counsel did not appear, the juvenile court changed the plan for father’s oldest child from reunification to “another planned permanent living arrangement” (APPLA) and changed the plans for father’s two younger children from reunification to guardianship. The substance of father’s challenge on appeal is that his counsel’s failure to appear at the permanency hearing constituted inadequate assistance of counsel under State ex rel Juv. Dept.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Department of Human Services v. A. D. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. M. U.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. T. L.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Department of Human Services v. T.L.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Department of Human Services v. K. M. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Department of Human Services v. A. S.-M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Department of Human Services v. M. U. L.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API