State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Geist
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Mother appeals from a circuit court order terminating her parental rights. Former ORS 419.523. We allowed review to consider her contention that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that it could not review her claim that her appointed trial counsel was inadequate. We hold that such claims may be reviewed on direct appeal. On de novo review, we find that mother’s counsel was adequate, and we affirm.
FACTS
We take the following facts from the Court of Appeals’ opinion:
“Mother has three children from her marriage to Bill Geist, who has had a severe drug and alcohol problem and has repeatedly…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- In the Interest of M.S.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Carrington H.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- Zockert v. FanningOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. B.R.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- In re Jonathan M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.