Legal Opinion
Miller v. Baldwin
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 12, 2001No. CV97-0197; A112032PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*502BREWER, P. J.
Petitioner has filed a motion for a delayed appeal from a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief. He asserts that his post-conviction counsel’s (counsel) failure to file a timely notice of appeal violated his statutory right to suitable counsel. ORS 138.590. He argues that the reasoning of State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Geist, 310 Or 176, 796 P2d 1193 (1990), in which the Supreme Court created a remedy for the violation of a statutory right to adequate counsel in termination of parental rights proceedings, should be extended to the statutory right to suitable…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Shipman v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Church v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. BalderasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Michael Wayne Jenkins v. Dan Johnson, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Knox v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Cunningham v. PremoMarion County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. M. U.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Behrle v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.