Legal Opinion
State v. Moses
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 1967No. 38497PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, J. —
This is an action involving claimed off-reservation treaty fishing rights by Indian defendants; and it is a companion case to that of the Puyallup Indians (ante p. 245, 422 P.2d 754) and of the Nisqually Indians (ante p. 275, 422 P.2d 771), filed today but presenting a different facet of the problem.
The action was commenced by the State of Washington on the relation of Charles O. Carroll, as Prosecuting Attorney of King County, Washington, against 15 individual de*283fendants, asking that they be enjoined from obstructing fish runs on the Green River and its tributaries. It was alleged…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Paulson v. HigginsWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Hill v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- H. G. Maison v. Confederated Tribes Of The Umatilla Indian ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Department of Game v. KautzWashington Supreme Court · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- State v. SweetWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
- State ex rel. Bain v. Clallam County Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.