Legal Opinion

Hill v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1952No. 32021PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

The appellant has taken an appeal from a judgment of the superior court awarding respondent damages arising out of personal injuries sustained by him. The judgment was based upon findings of fact made by the court to the effect that appellant ha.d kept and maintained one of its public sidewalks in a defective and dangerous condition, that respondent caught one of his feet in the defect, fell and was injured, and that he was free from fault.

The appellant seeks a review of the evidence and a determination made that it does not support the findings of fact. We must decline to make such review…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BoundyWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Erickson v. KongsliWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. J. A. Wiley Co. v. RiggleWashington Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State ex rel. Bain v. Clallam County Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Paulson v. HigginsWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Union Bank v. KrugerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  5. Porter v. CHICAGO M. ST. P. & PR CO.Washington Supreme Court · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API