Legal Opinion

Department of Game v. Kautz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1967No. 38560PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J. —

This is an action by the Department of Game of the State of Washington and the Department of Fisheries of the State of Washington, hereinafter called the Departments, against 12 named individuals and a John Doe, all of whom it is alleged, “have threatened and are fishing extensively in the Nisqually River with set nets and drift nets,” under a claim of special privileges or immunities from the conservation laws of the State of Washington.

The Departments alleged that if the defendants’ net fishing was permitted to continue the anadromous fish1 runs of the Nisqually River would be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Tulee v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Ward v. Race HorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. New York Ex Rel. Kennedy v. BeckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. MoosWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. MosesWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Department of Game v. KautzWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. MoosWashington Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API