Legal Opinion

United States v. Washington

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1975No. Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602 and 74-2705PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

The United States brought this suit to enforce compliance by the State of Washington and its Departments of Game and Fisheries with certain treaties between the federal government and various Indian tribes of western Washington (treaty Indians; treaty tribes). The Government initially represented the interests of seven named tribes. Other tribes intervened, and fourteen tribes are now named parties plaintiff. Organizations of commercial and sports fishermen intervened as parties defendant or participated as amici curiae.

The district court found that Washington could not…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Samish Indian Nation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API