Legal Opinion
H. G. Maison v. Confederated Tribes Of The Umatilla Indian Reservation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1963No. 17139_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
314 F.2d 169
H. G. MAISON, Individually and as Superintendent, Dept. of State Police of the State of Oregon, et al., Appellants,
v.
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF the UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION et al., Appellees.
No. 17139.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
February 15, 1963.
Robert Y. Thornton, Atty. Gen. of Oregon, Arthur G. Higgs and Roy C. Atchison, Asst. Attys. Gen., Salem, Or., for appellant.
Frank E. Nash, Mark C. McClanahan, King, Miller, Anderson, Nash & Yerke, Portland, Or., for appellees.
Before HAMLIN, MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.
KOELSCH, Circuit Judge.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Tulee v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Tracy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sohappy v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1969
- United States v. MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1979
- Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. MosesWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.