Legal Opinion
Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 1967No. 38611PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, J. —
The Department of Game of the State of Washington and the Department of Fisheries of the State of Washington, hereinafter called the Departments, brought *247this declaratory judgment action1 for the purpose of determining whether certain named individuals had, as members of the Puyallup Indian Tribe, any privileges or immunities from the application of state conservation measures.
The defendants asserted rights under article 3 of the Treaty of Medicine Creek (10 Stat. 1132) between the United States and various Indian tribes including the Puyallups. This treaty was signed December 26,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Organized Village of Kake v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Jones v. MeehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Tulee v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
- Department of Game of Wash. v. Puyallup TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1978
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.