State v. Sweet
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
This is an appeal from a superior court order denying an application for post-conviction relief. The issue raised is whether the State has the burden of demonstrating waiver of the constitutional right to appeal. We hold that it is the State's burden to affirmatively demonstrate waiver. On these facts the State has not met that burden. We set aside the court's order and reinstate the appeal.
The appellant, Norman Earl Sweet, was convicted by a jury of the crime of the unlawful possession of a controlled substance. At trial and the subsequent sentencing he was represented by a retained…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McKane v. DurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- In RE McNEAR v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. StrodeWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re the Personal Restraint of JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- John v. Carothers v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.