Eddie v. Schumacher Wall Board Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
In November, 1919, Prank A. Garbutt and W. W. Oreutt entered into possession of described premises, including a certain building and appurtenances thereon in the city of Los Angeles under a lease from the plaintiff of said property, for the purpose of conducting therein a plaster-mill for the manufacture of wall board. On August 30, 1920, defendant entered into possession of said building as sublessee of Garbutt and Orcutt and continued therein as such sublessee until the termination of the lease on November 16, 1920. At said time of entry by defendant the plaintiff executed a lease to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Foster v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Nahhas v. BrowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- J. B. Hill v. PinqueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kyne v. EusticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Larmour v. CampanaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Norton v. Central Surety & Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- City of Los Angeles v. MoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Pactor Corp. v. Manpower Inc. of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.