Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Moyer

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 25, 1930No. Docket No. 5776PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.

Condemnation proceedings by the City of Los Angeles against J. M. Moyer (now Mrs. J. M. York) and Charles Lantz. This is an appeal from an order taxing costs and reducing the amounts claimed by defendants in their memorandum of costs and disbursements, and involved two propositions:(1) The sufficiency of the notice of motion to tax costs.(2) The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings of the trial court.

We believe the notice of motion to tax costs was sufficient to put at issue each material fact relating to the allowance of the costs demanded.

The appellants contend that the court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wetherbee v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. City of Long Beach v. StenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Siebe v. Joshua Hendy Machine WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Eddie v. Schumacher Wall Board Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Windas v. Galston & Sutton Theatres Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Fares v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Loewenberg v. SchneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API