Legal Opinion
Kyne v. Eustice
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 2, 1963No. Civ. 20862PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal after the sustaining of a demurrer to the complaint.
Questions Presented
1. Does the complaint state a cause of action?
2. Does the failure of the trial court to state in its decision the ground or grounds for sustaining demurrer constitute prejudicial error?
The Record
The plaintiff’s complaint alleged as follows: that defendant had secured a default judgment against the plaintiff in the amount of $353.50; that thereafter the plaintiff was ordered to appear before the municipal court to be examined by the defendant concerning her property; that the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Wells v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Peters v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- John Breuner Co. v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Thornton v. RhodenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. HamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Templeton Feed & Grain v. Ralston Purina Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Clark Equipment Co. v. WheatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Ion Equipment Corp. v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.