Legal Opinion
Norton v. Central Surety & Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1935No. Civ. 9895PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
The plaintiff, Bertha Norton, sued Floyd Puter for damages in Del Norte County on account of severe personal injuries sustained by her while riding as a guest in an automobile owned and driven by Puter. The action was tried before the court sitting without a jury, and plaintiff was given judgment for $3,500. An appeal was taken in behalf of Puter and the judgment was affirmed. (Norton v. Puter, 138 Cal. App. 253 [32 Pac. (2d) 172].) At the time of the accident Puter was covered by a policy of public liability insurance issued by Central Surety and Insurance Company, the appellant herein, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Francis v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Norton v. PuterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Finkle v. Western Automobile InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Campbell v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
- DeGraf v. Anglo California National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. KovalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. WeimarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Campbell v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.