Legal Opinion
Larmour v. Campanale
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 30, 1979No. Civ. 18588PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTTERMORE, J. *
In a first amended cross-complaint, appellants sought damages for libel and breach of a contract to buy their home. Respondents had agreed to purchase the home through an escrow at Mission Escrow Company, Inc. and to seek a loan commitment from the Veterans Administration. The deal fell through and this litigation followed.
The first cause of action for libel set forth a demand letter to appellants from respondents’ attorney, with a copy to Mission Escrow. Following his demand for performance, counsel wrote he had advised his clients of their right to sue for specific…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Lerette v. Dean Witter Organization, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Smith v. HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Frank Pisano & Associates v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Eddie v. Schumacher Wall Board Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Club Valencia Homeowners Ass'n v. Valencia AssociatesColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Fuhrman v. California Satellite SystemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Blanchard v. DirecTV, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Financial Corp. of America v. WilburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Price v. ArmourUtah Supreme Court · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.