Legal Opinion

J. B. Hill v. Pinque

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1922No. Civ. No. 4131PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in 'the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment in favor of the defendants for costs in the second trial of an action brought originally for the cancellation of a lease upon the ground of nonpayment of rent and for the recovery of damages for waste, alleged to have been committed upon certain leased premises. In the first trial judgment went for the plaintiff, but upon appeal it was reversed (179 Cal. 759 [3 A. L. R. 669, 178 Pac. 952]), and upon the return of the case to the trial court the plaintiff amended its complaint, which, as thus amended, contained three counts, viz., (1) an action for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J. B. Hill Co. v. PinqueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Pelton v. San Jacinto Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hughlett v. HarrisCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1830
  4. Dickinson v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Webb v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Eddie v. Schumacher Wall Board Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Pinque v. J. B. Hill Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Webb v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API