Legal Opinion

State v. Mecham

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 29, 1992No. 1 CA-CV 90-423PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

Following the 1986 general election, several of then-Governor Mecham’s supporters formed an Inaugural Committee (the “Committee”). The Committee raised money and deposited it in the Mecham Inaugural Fund to finance Governor Mecham’s private inaugural activities and to pay off his campaign debt. The Maricopa County Attorney (the “County Attorney”) threatened to sue the Committee, claiming its activities violated newly-enacted campaign finance laws. The Committee compromised the dispute by transferring the Mecham Inaugural Fund to the office of the Governor. Once transferred…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. United Bank of Arizona v. AllynCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Lacer v. Navajo CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re ShannonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Carroll v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Delbridge v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. Delbridge v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. PNL Credit L.P. v. Southwest Pacific Investment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API