Legal Opinion
Lacer v. Navajo County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 17, 1984No. 1 CA-CIV 5508PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OGG, Presiding Judge.
In this appeal we must decide whether Navajo County is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to Rule 21, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure 1 , and A.R.S. § 12-341.01. Although the court normally disposes of such matters by unpublished orders, the issue presented is of such significance that we feel a published opinion is warranted. See Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc., 138 Ariz. 183, 673 P.2d 927 (App.1983).
We begin by briefly reviewing the background giving rise to this matter. Appel lant, Mary Zuck Lacer, filed an action against Navajo…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Wistuber v. Paradise Valley Unified School DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Autenreith v. NorvilleArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Heritage Heights Home Owners Ass'n v. EsserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Shirley v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Softsolutions, Inc. v. Brigham Young UniversityUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re ShannonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Rogus v. LordsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.