Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Robinson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 12, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 91-0593PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Judge.

Appellant Robert Carroll (“plaintiff’) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendants and from the denial of a Motion for a New Trial. He alleges that the defendants’ actions: 1) defamed him; 2) tortiously interfered with the business relationship between him and his employer; 3) inflicted severe emotional distress; and 4) deprived him of constitutionally protected property and liberty interests without due process. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff became the director of the Sunshine…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Link v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  2. Webb v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Bd. of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Burns v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Galati v. Lake Havasu CityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API