Legal Opinion
In Re Shannon
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1994No. SB-92-0001-D. Disc. Comm. Nos. 88-1932, 89-0710PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORCORAN, Justice.
On February 5, 1990, the State Bar of Arizona filed a formal complaint with a Hearing Committee (Committee) charging Respondent John Adair Shánnon, Jr. with two counts of unethical conduct in which Respondent allegedly violated numerous ethical rules enumerated in rule 42, Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court. By a 2-1 vote, the Committee recommended that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year. The 8-member Disciplinary Commission (Commission) unanimously adopted the Committee’s recommendation and further recommended that Respondent…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Hoover v. RonwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Mothershed v. Justices of the Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Grievance Administrator v. LopatinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Attorney Discipline SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. WagnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Matter of Discipline of BabilisUtah Supreme Court · 1997
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.