McVerry v. Boyd
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
— This is an action to foreclose the lien of a street assessment upon a lot on Clay Street, in the city of San Francisco.
The appeal is by defendant Boyd from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.
Findings of fact were waived.
April 3d was the day upon which the contract of plaintiff for the completion of the work expired, and upon that day the board of supervisors passed the following'resolution: “Resolved that the superintendent of public streets, highways, and squares be and is hereby directed to grant the following extensions of time on *306street contracts, viz., to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jennings v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Raisch v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Beveridge v. LivingstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Himmelmann v. HoadleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Boyle v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Irish v. HahnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Smith v. LightstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Buckman v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Ede v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Girvin v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.