Girvin v. Simon
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from an order denying a new trial. Ansel Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action to foreclose the lien of a street assessment, levied by virtue of a contract for grading and paving in part with basalt and in part with bitumen and for curbing Channel street, in the city of Stockton, from the east line of Hunter street to the west line of California street, etc.
The contract was let by the street superintendent of the city of Stockton on the twelfth day of September, 1892, to one F. J. Owens, who thereafter and on the *607twenty-second day of September, 1892, assigned to the plaintiffs and appellants herein, by whom the work was performed.
The cause…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lent v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Bucknall v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Perine v. ForbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Manning v. DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Capeon v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Curtice v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Rogers Brothers Co. v. BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Smith v. LightstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Federal Construction Co. v. NewhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Greenwood v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.