Jennings v. Le Breton
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion*
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
The action is to recover an assessment amounting to $1,898, for grading Bay Street, between Larkin Street and Van Ness Avenue, in the city of San Francisco, levied upon lot numbered 5 on the diagram of the assessment, having a frontage of 137-i feet on that part of Bay Street alleged to have been graded. Judgment was given for plaintiff, and the defendants appeal from the judgment, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The grading was ordered in pursuance of an act of the legislature to authorize the board of supervisors of San Francisco “ to order Bay Street…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Taylor v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- People v. LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Lent v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Haynes v. MeeksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Emery v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Speer v. Mayor of AthensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- O'Dea v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Fresno Estate Co. v. FiskeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Barboza v. Pacific Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.