Raisch v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
This is an action to recover the sum of $3,728.50, claimed to be due from defendant to plaintiff for work done under a contract between the plaintiff and the superintendent of streets.
It is alleged in the complaint that the board of supervisors, on August 22, 1876, adopted a resolution of intention to lay asphaltum sidewalks on Third Street from Market to Mission; that the resolution was published for ten successive days; that a resolution ordering .the work was passed September 11, 1876; that notice of the proposed work was duly published and posted by the clerk; that plaintiff, among…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Martin v. ZellerbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Beveridge v. LivingstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Fanning v. SchammelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Thompson v. DoaksumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by19 opinions
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Lukens v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Brady v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Oakland Paving Co. v. Whittell Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Ocean Shore Railroad v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.