Ede v. Knight
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
This is an action to foreclose a street assessment lien.
The court found that the work was not completed within the time specified in the contract; that the time within which the work was to be completed was not extended; that no assessment was made to cover the sum due for the work named in the complaint, nor was any *161diagram ever made showing the particular lot, or portion of lot, with the number of feet frontage assessed for the work; that the lot described in the complaint was never assessed for the work; and that no public demand was made as required by law, nor was any return made upon…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McCracken v. HaywardSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Jefferson Branch Bank v. SkellySupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Chambers v. SatterleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Hewes v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Jennings v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Joseph Denunzio Fruit Co. v. CraneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
- Witter v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Reid v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Buckman v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.