Cross v. Mayo
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Solano County and from an order refusing a new trial. A. J. Buckles, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
After further consideration the court adopts the opinion written by Mr. Justice Angellotti when the ease was decided in Department. That opinion is as follows:
We have in this case an appeal from what is declared by defendant to be the final judgment in an action brought by plaintiff to obtain a decree declaring and adjudging that defendant had failed to perform his part of a contract for the purchase by him from plaintiff of certain real property of plaintiff, fixing a time within which he should so comply, and decreeing that if he did not so comply within said time he should be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Bailey v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Oursler v. ThacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Williams v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Petersen v. RidenourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Keelan v. Belmont Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.