Legal Opinion
Winter v. Kitto
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 8, 1929No. Docket No. 6730PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The defendant is the owner of certain real property in Lake County. Early in 1927 the parties to the action and Fred T. Winter entered into negotiations for the sale and purchase of the property. On February 1st of that year a written agreement was drawn setting forth the terms of sale, in which the defendant was named as vendor and the plaintiff and Fred T. Winter, his brother, as vendees. The writing was signed by the plaintiff and the defendant, but not by Fred T. Winter. The terms of sale were $4,000, payable $250 in cash, a like sum on August 1, 1927, and the balance in…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Cleary v. FolgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Drew v. PedlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Shively v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Tuso v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Keelan v. Belmont Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Wilson v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Angell v. RowlandsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Hunt v. MahoneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Helperin v. GuzzardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.