Legal Opinion

State v. Marshall

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1963PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction after having been found guilty of the crime defined in ORS 166.270 which makes unlawful the possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence over his objection the gun which was revealed to be in his possession through a search made by officer John Kennard of the Klamath Falls Police Department. The ground for this objection, and a previous motion to suppress the evidence, is that the search was in violation of Article I, § 9, Oregon Constitution, which proscribes unreasonable…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. McPeakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. United States v. ReckisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
  3. Dawson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. United States v. De VivoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1961
  5. Compton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DouglasOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. LittleOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. HirschOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. PogueOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API