State v. Marshall
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction after having been found guilty of the crime defined in ORS 166.270 which makes unlawful the possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.
Defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence over his objection the gun which was revealed to be in his possession through a search made by officer John Kennard of the Klamath Falls Police Department. The ground for this objection, and a previous motion to suppress the evidence, is that the search was in violation of Article I, § 9, Oregon Constitution, which proscribes unreasonable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. McPeakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- United States v. ReckisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
- Dawson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
- United States v. De VivoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1961
- Compton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DouglasOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. LittleOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. HirschOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. PogueOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.