State v. Hirsch
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.
The defendant was indicted for a theft by receiving. ORS 164.095. The jury returned a verdict of guilty and the defendant appealed. The Court of Appeals by per curiam opinion, State v. Mark Lee Hirsch, 12 Or App 20, 503 P2d 726 (1972), held:
“Affirmed. State v. Keller, 9 Or App 613, 497 P2d 868, Sup Ct review allowed (1972).”
We granted review because the Court of Appeals relied upon their decision in Keller, in which we granted review and reversed. See State v. Keller, 265 Or 622, 510 P2d 568 (1973).
A review of the evidence in this case reveals there is' no similarity between the facts in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. ClomanOregon Supreme Court · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- State v. MacHucaOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.