Legal Opinion
State v. Roy
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 28, 1977No. 73-C, CA 6972PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
Defendant appeals from his conviction of first degree burglary, ORS 164.225, and assigns as error (1) the court’s denial of his motion to suppress and (2) the procedure used by the court in merging with the burglary count, for the purposes of sentencing, a count of conspiracy to commit burglary.
On April 6, 1976, a medical clinic in Fossil was burglarized and a quantity of drugs stolen. On April 13, 1976, defendant and Randy Neff were arrested in a tavern for an unrelated theft. As defendant was being placed in the police car, he asked Pat Donnelly, who had accompanied defendant and Neff to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. FrameCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Commonwealth v. BarnesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.