Legal Opinion

State v. McPeak

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1955No. 649PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The defendants’ assignments of error present one question for decision: Were the implements of housebreaking and the narcotic drugs found in McPeak’s automobile admitted in evidence in violation of the provisions of G.S. 15-27, Article 1, Section 11, of the State Constitution and the 14th Amendment to the U. S. Constitution?

It is well settled law that a person may waive his right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. A consent to search will constitute such a waiver, only if it clearly appears that the person voluntarily consented, or permitted, or expressly invited and agreed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Zap v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Goldstein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. The People v. PrestonIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  4. United States v. De VastoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  5. Steeber v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API