Murdo Township v. Townsend
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Plaintiff township instituted this action against the defendant Townsend, treasurer of said township, and the defendant Western Surety Company, the surety on -his official ■bond, to recover the sum of $1,500, which it was alleged that the defendant Townsend had received in his official capacity and had failed to account for, or to pay over, upon due demand, to his successor in office. Findings, conclusions, and judgment in the court below were in favor of plaintiff and against both defendants for the recovery of the amount asked in the complaint, and defendants have appealed.
Material facts…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Independent School Dist. v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Independent School Dist. v. FlittieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Onida Independent School Dist. No. 1 v. GrothSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- City of Wessington Springs v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Board of Education of the Independent School District v. WhismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beaver County v. Home Indemnity Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1935
- Hipp v. Prudential Casualty & Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Thunder Hawk School Dist. v. Western Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Murdo Independent School Dist. v. LitzenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- City of Portageville v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.